Dear Editor,

The recent decision by the

Guyana Elections Commission

(GECOM), under the leadership of Chairperson Justice (Ret’d) Claudette Singh, to forego the implementation of a biometric voting system for the 2025 general and regional elections is both perplexing and alarming. This move not only undermines the integrity of our electoral process but also raises serious concerns about the commission’s impartiality and commitment to democratic principles.

A History of Inaction

It is disconcerting that GECOM has had ample time since the 2020 elections to explore and implement biometric solutions. The introduction of such technology has been a topic of discussion for years, with various stakeholders advocating for its adoption to enhance the credibility of our elections. Despite this, the commission now cites a “tight timeframe” as the primary reason for its inability to implement biometrics for the upcoming elections. This excuse is unacceptable and indicative of a lack of foresight and proactive planning. As noted by Demerara Waves, Justice Singh acknowledged that tasks such as stakeholder consultations, procurement of equipment, and staff training would be necessary for implementation, yet these steps were not initiated in a timely manner. When do you intend to start?

Questionable Impartiality

The decision to reject biometrics aligns conspicuously with the preferences of the ruling People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C). This alignment raises legitimate questions about the independence of GECOM under Justice Singh’s stewardship. From staffing appointments to critical decisions like this, there appears to be a pattern of actions favouring the PPP/C, thereby eroding public trust in the commission’s neutrality. As reported by Demerara Waves, opposition figures have expressed concerns about the commission’s decisions and their implications for electoral fairness.

Ignoring Technological Advancements

In an era where technology plays a pivotal role in ensuring transparency and efficiency, GECOM’s reluctance to adopt biometric systems is regressive. Biometric identification has been successfully implemented in numerous democracies worldwide, significantly reducing instances of voter fraud and impersonation. By dismissing this technology, GECOM is not only ignoring global best practices but also failing to address the legitimate concerns of the electorate regarding the accuracy and fairness of the voting process.

Call for Accountability

Given these troubling developments, it is imperative that Justice Singh reevaluates her position as Chairperson of GECOM. Her tenure has been marked by decisions that cast doubt on the commission’s commitment to impartiality and transparency. To restore public confidence, a leadership change may be necessary—one that prioritizes the nation’s democratic health over partisan interests.

The integrity of Guyana’s electoral process is paramount to the health of our democracy. GECOM’s decision to reject biometric voting systems for the 2025 elections is a step backward, undermining efforts to ensure free, fair, and transparent elections. It is incumbent upon all stakeholders to hold the commission accountable and advocate for reforms that will strengthen our democratic institutions.

Yours faithfully,

R. Williams