Opinion

The President's efforts to boost poultry production in Guyana face challenges like smuggling, disease, and corruption. Despite plans and initial steps, issues like ineffective vaccines and political favoritism hinder progress. Corruption has led to farm closures, impacting food security and leaving farmers struggling.

Sanjeev Datadin argues against renegotiating the Exxon-Guyana petroleum contract, emphasizing the sanctity of contract law and the destabilizing effects of renegotiation. He criticizes Christopher Ram's call for renegotiation, highlighting the benefits of the current agreement and the legal implications of the stabilization clause. Datadin supports the Local Content Act for economic benefits.

The letter discusses Guyana's efforts to improve waste management, including establishing 13 landfill sites and acquiring equipment for waste collection. It highlights the health and environmental risks of improper waste disposal and supports government initiatives for sustainable development and public engagement.

Lincoln Lewis criticizes President Irfaan Ali for failing to fulfill campaign promises, including renegotiating oil contracts and improving public sector pay. Ali is accused of political immaturity and being overshadowed by former president Bharrat Jagdeo. Despite Guyana's economic growth, Ali's leadership is seen as ineffective, worsening inequality and failing to plan for long-term development.

Deodatt Singh criticizes Vishnu Bisram's claims about political support in Guyana, questioning the validity of his polls and findings. Singh challenges Bisram to provide evidence for his statements and to disclose details about his polling organization, NACTA. Singh argues that Bisram's conclusions are obvious and unsupported by actual data.

The author expresses concern over the elderly waiting in lines for cash grants. She suggests a better-coordinated system, like the Flood relief registration, to reduce stress and health risks for pensioners. The government is encouraged to learn from this for future improvements.

Mervyn Williams criticizes the PPP's claim that democracy returned to Guyana in 1992, arguing it is deceptive. He discusses historical electoral systems, particularly the FPTP and PR systems, and credits the PNC for introducing PR. Williams challenges the PPP to clarify their stance on democracy and their historical opposition to PR.

Devin Sears expresses concern over delays in school repairs in Guyana, criticizing the PPP government for inadequate planning. He urges the Ministry of Education to take action to ensure timely school reopening. Sears stands with affected communities, advocating for investment in education for Guyana's development.

Amoura Giddings argues for reforming Guyana's legal system with a focus on love, as defined in 1 Corinthians 13:4-7, to address societal issues like poverty and crime. She emphasizes the need for a justice system that respects the rule of law and incorporates love in its approach to rehabilitation and deterrence.

Amanda Baker expresses concern over Labour's potential foreign policy missteps, drawing parallels to past decisions like the Iraq War. She highlights the chaos caused by the Trump transition, Russian mockery, and the influence of figures like Farage and Musk. Baker emphasizes the plight of Ukraine amidst these geopolitical tensions.

The letter discusses the upcoming 2025 elections in Guyana, questioning the transparency of candidate selections. It highlights the incumbent PPP's candidates and speculates on the opposition's potential candidates, emphasizing the need for transparency and public awareness in the electoral process.

Jamil Changlee questions why the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act hasn't been applied to investigate the Exxon contract. He cites issues with the contract signing bonus and GRA audit results, urging a U.S. investigation. He also calls for a referendum in Guyana on contract renegotiation, emphasizing its importance for the 2025 elections.

The letter criticizes the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) for partisan appointments, undermining its neutrality. It highlights international studies warning against such practices and compares with countries like Canada and India, which maintain impartial electoral bodies. The author urges reforms for transparent and non-partisan governance to ensure credible elections in 2025.